Tails From The Zoo

Manitoba Biodiversity February 4, 2010

Filed under: Biodiversity,Uncategorized — Scott Gray @ 11:20 am
Tags: , ,

Here are a couple of good biodiversity articles. The first one focuses on biodiversity issues from a Manitoba perspective:

http://www.keewatin.ca/Media/Manitoba.pdf

.

The second one is an article by Bob Wrigley, the Assiniboine Park Zoo’s Curator. It’s a great introduction to biodiversity around the province with a historical context. Here’s a quick excerpt:

There are 635 vertebrate (back-boned) animals, over 31,000 invertebrates (“lower” animals), 2433 plants, 800 lichens (a symbiotic association of fungi and algae), 3000 fungi, and a staggering 36,000 algae in Manitoba; certain of these figures will continue to rise with new studies.

Please click here to read the full article: Buzzword Biodiversity

 

International Year of Biodiversity Gets Started January 15, 2010

International Year of Biodiversity Officially Launched
Merinews, 15 January 2010
GERMAN CHANCELLOR Angela Merkel and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon officially launched the International Year of Biodiversity on 11th January. Launching the International Year of Biodiversity in Berlin, the German Chancellor urged the world to take the necessary steps to protect the biological diversity of the Earth.
More: http://www.merinews.com/article/international-year-of-biodiversity-officially-launched/15794253.shtml

.

UN biodiversity year aims to slow species extinction
Irish Times, 12 January 2010
BERLIN – German chancellor Angela Merkel urged industrialised and emerging countries to invest more in protecting wildlife and said the UN should create a body to refine scientific arguments for saving animal and plant species.
More: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2010/0112/1224262120782.html

.

UN launches 2010 as International Year of Biodiversity
Xinhuanet, 12 January 2010
UNITED NATIONS, Jan. 11 (Xinhua) — As the United Nations Monday kicked off its official launch of 2010 as the International Year of Biodiversity to highlight the continued devastation on the world’s species, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called it a “wake-up call” to protect the globe’s natural resources.
More: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2010-01/12/content_12793207.htm

.

International Year of Biodiversity is not just a celebration, but a call to action
Bird-life International, 12 January 2010
The United Nations has launched 2010 as the International Year of Biodiversity (IYB) at an event in Berlin, Germany. Speakers included Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel, and a video message from UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-Moon.
More: http://www.birdlife.org/news/news/2010/01/biodiversity_year.html

.

World must step up efforts on saving species: Merkel
Reuters, 12 January 2010
BERLIN (Reuters) – German Chancellor Angela Merkel urged industrialized and emerging countries to invest more in protecting wildlife and said the U.N. should create a body to refine scientific arguments for saving animal and plant species.
More: http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/environment/~3/uh0i2edrxm0/idUSTRE60A32420100111

.

Arranca el Año Internacional de la Biodiversidad
El Mundo , 12 January 2010
La canciller alemana, Angela Merkel, equipara la importancia de la defensa de la biodiversidad con la lucha contra el cambio climático.  Leer . Escuchar
More: http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2010/01/11/ciencia/1263224980.html

.

Ban urges global alliance to save biodiversity as UN launches International Year
UN News Centre, 12 January 2010
11 January 2010 – As the United Nations officially launched the International Year of Biodiversity today, Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon called the failure to protect the world’s natural resources a “wake-up call” and urged each country and each person to engage in a global alliance to protect life on Earth.
More: http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=33450&Cr=biodiversity&Cr1=

.

World’s biodiversity ‘crisis’ needs action, says UN

Richard Black—BBCNews.co.uk.

The UN has launched the International Year of Biodiversity, warning that the ongoing loss of species around the world is affecting human well-being. Eight years ago, governments pledged to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010, but the pledge will not be met. The expansion of human cities, farming and infrastructure is the main reason.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8449506.stm

 

Manitoba Biodiversity Network January 13, 2010

Filed under: Biodiversity,Eco-Dates — Scott Gray @ 9:44 pm
Tags: , ,

The Manitoba Biodiversity Network (Bio-Net for short)

We are an committed group of individuals and agencies that is passionate about nature and concerned about protecting it. Bio-Net is lead by representatives from Manitoba Conservation, Assiniboine Park Zoo, Zoological Society of Manitoba, Living Prairie Museum, Ft Whyte Alive, Invasive Species Council of Manitoba, Manitoba Museum, Oak Hammock Marsh Interpretive Centre and the University of Manitoba, as well as a number of private citizens.

One of the members, Nature North, is acting as our central hub for all of our articles, events, resources and I hope you have a chance to visit the site. www.naturenorth.com

.

To get things started, here is the UN proclamation announcing International Year of Biodiversity:

UN Proclamation

“The United Nations General Assembly has proclaimed 2010 as the International Year of Biodiversity. This year coincides with the 2010 Biodiversity Target adopted by the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity and by Heads of State and government at the World Summit for Sustainable Development in Johannesburg in 2002.

The celebrations of the International Year of Biodiversity are a unique opportunity to raise public awareness about the vital role of biodiversity in sustaining life on Earth and of its importance to human well-being and poverty reduction.

The main goals of the year are to:

• Enhance public awareness on the importance of conserving biodiversity and on the underlying threats to biodiversity;

• Raise awareness of the accomplishments to save biodiversity by communities and governments;

and to:

• Promote innovative solutions to reduce these threats;

• Call on individuals, organizations and governments to take immediate steps to halt biodiversity loss;

• Initiate dialogue among stakeholders on necessary steps for the post-2010 period. “

(David Ainsworth, Secretariat, Convention on Biological Diversity)

.

Check out our Bio-Days chart if you’re not sure how to get involved or think a whole year is too big a commitment. You can pick one or two ecologically important dates to help do be greener. View the calendar here: www.zoosociety.com

2010 Biodiversity Logo

 

Biodiversity and Saving Animals

Filed under: Biodiversity,World News — Scott Gray @ 9:22 pm
Tags: ,

“Starting Monday, celebrations and events across the world will highlight the beginning of the UN’s Year of International Biodiversity and the loss of our richly varied flaura and fauna, which is estimated to be as high as 1,000 times the natural rate as a result of human activities.”

Read the full article, by Robert Bloomfield of The Guardian here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/cif-green/2010/jan/11/biodiversity-year-of-international-biodiversity

.

“Biodiversity is integral to our daily lives.”

That is one of the core reasons for my joining the Manitoba’s Biodiversity Network in 2008. But the past couple of years have just been a warm up. Manitoba’s Bio-net plans on being very busy through out 2010 to celebrate International Year of Biodiversity. Stayed tuned to this blog throughout the year for all sorts of biodiversity information, links, resources and more. You can also find additional information about our group’s efforts on www.naturenorth.com, a wonderful site listing even more wildlife resources and articles on nature and biodiversity.

 

Extinction by the Numbers January 5, 2010

Filed under: Biodiversity,Extinction,Uncategorized — Scott Gray @ 4:09 pm
Tags: , , , ,

Here’s are a few numbers that most people don’t know, but need to:

● Up to 30,000 species (including plants, animals, fungi) per year are going extinct: three per hour.
● Fifty percent of all primates and 100 percent of all great apes are threatened with extinction.
● Three of the world’s nine tiger subspecies became extinct in the past 60 years; the remaining six are all endangered.
● Humans have already driven 20 percent of all birds extinct.
● Twelve percent of mammals, 12 percent of birds, 31 percent of reptiles, 30 percent of amphibians, and 37 percent of fish are threatened with extinction.

Learn more about the extinction crisis from www.biologicaldiversity.com

 

October’s Eco-Dates October 6, 2009

So what did you do on October 4? Did you celebrate World Animal Day? I hope so. In fact I hope you celebrate animals everyday, but in case you missed this year’s celebrations, here’s a re-cap.

World Animal Day, October 4

We celebrate World Animal Day to express our compassion and concern for all creatures. World Animal Day’s mission is to: celebrate animal life in all its forms; celebrate humankind’s relationship with the animal kingdom; acknowledge the diverse roles animals play in our lives; and be thankful for the way in which animals enrich our lives. To find out more, please visit: World Animal Day

As a reminder, there are a couple more upcoming dates to celebrate.

Waste Reduction Week runs October 19-25

Waste Reduction Week aims to inform and engage Canadians about the environmental and social impact of our wasteful practices. It strives to educate, engage and empower Canadians to reduce, reuse and recycle waste. Everyone, including schools, businesses, and individuals can all get involved! Visit Waste Reduction Week Canada at http://www.wrwcanada.com/ for more information and resources.

International Day of Climate Action is on October 24

Scientists now know that an environment with carbon in the atmosphere that tops 350 parts per million will not support life as we know it. Sadly, we’re already past that number, at 390 parts per million, which is why the Arctic is melting and drought is spreading across the planet. 350 gives us a target to aim for. Join the international movement on October 24 to take a stand for a safe climate future and raise awareness about this important number (350). Make a statement to get the attention of the world’s leaders, before they meet in Copenhagen in December to reach an agreement on a new climate treaty. Visit www.350.org to make a difference before it becomes too hard to reach our goal.

 

Zoo Amphibian Signs June 1, 2009

New Amphibian Interpretive Signs For Manitoba

2008 was the International Year of the Frog – a huge international effort to promote the conservation of the remaining amphibians from the current extinction crisis.  Dozens of the world’s 6000 species have become extinct in the last hundred years, and biologists feel that as many as 35% to 50% of the remaining species will disappear within the next generation. This is in part due to a chytrid fungal disease (now spread nearly worldwide), exploitation of amphibians through the pet trade and as a food source, habitat loss, climate change, pollution, and other causes.  Numerous zoos in dozens of countries are taking in and breeding the surviving remnant populations of frogs on the edge of extinction. Hundreds of others spent 2008 promoting amphibian conservation throughout their facilities and into the schools. The task is enormous, costly, and technically challenging but the effort is worth it.

As part of the Assinboine Park Zoo and Zoo Society of Manitoba’s contribution to this program, (in addition to the amphibian based tours, talks and camps that occurred at the Zoo Education Centre last year), bilingual, illustrated signs (20 x 24-inch) were produced on all 15 species in the province.  These signs (including frogs, toads and salamanders) are now being installed at the zoo.  You can view them on the internet at the Zoo Society’s website, www.zoosociety.com and at www.naturenorth.com.

Thanks to a grant from Manitoba Conservation’s Sustainable Development Innovations Fund, the zoo was able to produce 165 signs for 18 organizations around the province, and these are just now been distributed. Copies were made available to all Manitoba nature facilities free of charge and will soon be displayed in many national, provincial and city parks, museums, nature centres, and public trails (e.g., Bishop Grandin Greenway Trail).

 

Buzzword Biodiversity May 22, 2009

By Dr. Robert E. Wrigley, Curator, Assiniboine Park Zoo, Winnipeg

Biodiversity is a relatively new word in the conservation arena, and as broadly interpreted refers to the number of species in, or biological richness of, an area. In spite of biological inventories and diverse studies carried out over centuries over much of the planet, our knowledge of the natural world remains in its infancy, particular in distant and hazardous locations (e.g., sea floor). As biologists working in such facilities as museums, universities, provincial/territorial wildlife departments, zoos, aquariums, and conservation organizations, we tend to believe we have a reasonable grasp of the biodiversity in our area or province, but do we really? Could we list the taxa in our district, or even on the properties where we live and work?

We generally know what the larger and easily observed species of wildlife are, or the species in our areas of specialty, but this is just the tip of an enormous wealth of life forms of which we know literally nothing, with most species not yet even named and described. This is a serious omission in our knowledge base if we are truly to protect our local biodiversity, ecosystems, environment, and specific habitats. When we attempt to modify species’ populations, distributions (e.g., using exotics for biological control), habitats, and even genes, to support a species-at-risk or one of special interest (e.g., crops, commercial resource harvesting or recreational hunting/fishing), have we any idea what resulting waves (e.g., effects on numbers and gene frequencies of other biota) reverberate through the entire ecosystem? And yet at this time of greatest need for data, taxonomists and ecologists are declining in numbers due to lack of training and job opportunities (linked to funding priorities).

These dilemmas set me to thinking what I could contribute to the biodiversity knowledge of my home province – Manitoba. And so I have, with all naivety and modesty, attempted the impossible – a first crack at a biodiversity inventory of this province. I greatly appreciate the contributions to this effort of my colleagues, whom I placed in the uncomfortable and challenging position of coming up with their best estimates. Hopefully others will be encouraged to generate or update inventories in their districts, and to enlarge their concept of local biodiversity and conservation requirements.

Manitoba hosts five major life zones or biomes – Grassland, Boreal Coniferous Forest, Arctic Tundra, Freshwater, and Arctic Marine biomes, plus Aspen Parkland, Eastern Deciduous Forest, and Forest-Tundra transitions. Each of these major biological communities teems with countless numbers of diverse species, from huge whales, Lion’s Mane Jellyfish and the 7-metre Greenland Shark in Hudson Bay to bizarre microscopic life forms in the soil, water and air, and even in and on our bodies. Manitoba is truly buzzing with life during all seasons, even under the snow and ice.

Glaciers completely scoured the entire province of life about a dozen times in the last 1.5 million years – the Pleistocene Ice Age – which ended only 8,000 years ago. Yet Manitoba currently harbors all five kingdoms of life (plus Viruses) – Bacteria, Protoctista (microscopic protozoans and types of algae), Fungi, Plants and Animals. The larger types of animals and plants have received considerable attention and are more-readily studied, so their numbers are reasonably well known. However, species estimates for most other groups are only recently becoming available (see Table 1).

There are 635 vertebrate (back-boned) animals, over 31,000 invertebrates (“lower” animals), 2433 plants, 800 lichens (a symbiotic association of fungi and algae), 3000 fungi, and a staggering 36,000 algae in Manitoba; certain of these figures will continue to rise with new studies. There are no numerical estimates for other groups, such as protozoans, bacteria or viruses (The latter two are capable of rapid genetic change.), but they exist in Manitoba in the tens or hundreds of thousands of species or types. While mostly unknown, they form the supporting base of complex food webs, are integral to the cycling of matter and energy, and maintain conditions for life on our Earth.

The diversity of life in Manitoba is always changing over time, both in the short term and over the geological time frame. This occurs due to many factors in Nature, such as varying climate, sea level, species’ distribution, relationships with other species, and even bolide-impact events (i.e., meteorite, asteroid, comet). While earlier times (e.g., 10,000 years ago) witnessed the extinction of dozens of large mammals and birds in our region, only 10 species are officially (CDC Nature Serve) recognized as having been lost from Manitoba during historic times, either from extinction, like the Passenger Pigeon and Rocky Mountain Locust, or extirpation (i.e., survives elsewhere) such as the Swift Fox and Whooping Crane. An additional 25 species have not been detected for several decades and may be extirpated, while many other invertebrates have likely disappeared with the loss of native grassland.

To date, 1.75 million species have been named worldwide, and likely over 100 million species (mostly insects and microscopic forms) await discovery. Yet this is but a tiny fraction of the incredible biodiversity (countless billions) that has evolved over the last 3.6 billion years of life on Earth. So how many species are alive now in Manitoba? No one will ever be able to answer this question, but the number may exceed half-a-million. This rich biodiversity interacts within the various ecosystems of our province, generates our life-support systems, and supports our economy and standard of living. On the local level and worldwide, it is to our great advantage to support the conservation of all wildlife and to protect our environment.

Table 1. Recorded or Estimated Biodiversity of Manitoba

This table includes estimates of Manitoba’s current biodiversity (#’s of species) as well as historically extinct, extirpated, and exotic species (*). Estimates become less accurate with diminishing body size and lack of research. Species estimates for many other life forms remain unknown.

ANIMALS
Mammals 88
Birds 391
Reptiles 8 (Snakes 5, Lizard 1, Turtles 2)
Amphibians 16 (Frogs 8, Toads 4, Salamanders 4)
Fish 132 (freshwater 91, marine 41)
Arthropods 25,000 (A few groups of these joint-legged invertebrates are listed here.)
Ticks 15
Mites 5000
Lice 500
Pseudoscorpions 20
Centipedes 50
Millipedes 10
Crustaceans 200
Spiders 700
Insects 18,000
Springtails 200 Mayflies 80
Stoneflies 40 Caddisflies 200
Aphids 400 Midges 300
Thrips 60 Mosquitoes 50
Butterflies 111 Flies 6000
Skippers 33 Fleas 57
Moths 600 Leafhoppers 400
Beetles 2500 Treehoppers 41
Ants 81 Grasshoppers 68
Wasps 5000 Crickets 8
Bees 225 Dragonflies and Damselflies 100
Bugs 1400
Tunicates 18
Sea Squirts 16
Larvaceans 2
Molluscs 170
Snails 94
Clams and Scallops 72
Chitons 3
Tusk Shell 1
Rotifers 50
Water Bears (Tardigrades) 30
Roundworms 3000
Flatworms 3000 (land, freshwater and marine)
Annelid Worms
Earthworms 120 (including 100 freshwater and terrestrial ones & 20 marine)
Bristleworms 85
Leeches 24
Comb Jellies 3
Cnidarians (Jellyfish, Anemones, Soft Corals) 57
Sponges 5
Arrow Worms 3
PLANTS
Vascular Plants (Flowering Plants and Ferns) 1700 (native 1500, exotics 200)
Mosses 733
LICHENS 800
FUNGI 3000
PROTOCTISTANS (Unicellular protists) (Unknown, but in the hundreds of thousands)
Algae 36,000
BACTERIA and VIRUSES (Likely in the hundreds of thousands

*Species Estimates by:
Dr. Robert Wrigley (mammals, reptiles, amphibian, invertebrates), Rudolph Koes (birds), Dr. Ken Stewart and Dr. Bruce Stewart (fishes), Dr. Terry Galloway (arthropods), Dr. Eva Pip and Dr. Bruce Stewart (molluscs), Dr. Bruce Stewart (marine invertebrates), Dr. David Punter (fungi), Dr. Diana Bizecki-Rodson (vascular plants), Dr. Michele Piercey-Normore (mosses, lichens), Dr. Gordon Robinson (algae).

References

  • Hamel, Cary (pers. comm.) Nature Conservancy of Canada, Manitoba Region, and the Manitoba Conservation Data Centre.
  • Stewart, DB, and W.L. Lockhart, 2005, An overview of the Hudson Bay Marine Ecosystem, Can. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2586. A remarkable inventory of the little-studied ecosystems of Hudson Bay.
  • Wrigley, R.E. 2007. Zoological Author and Editor, The Encyclopedia of Manitoba. Great Plains Publications, 814 pp. The most-current and comprehensive information on Manitoba biodiversity.
 

Human Overpopulation, Poverty, and Wildlife Extinction

Filed under: Biodiversity,Eco-Dates,New Animals/Births — Scott Gray @ 2:15 am
Tags: , ,

By Dr. Robert E. Wrigley, Curator, Assiniboine Park Zoo.

This article is based on ones published in CAZA News (Canadian Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Jan-Feb 2000) and International Zoo News, June 2000;  47 (4): 210-214, and is reprinted here in support of International Biodiversity Day, 2009.

Abstract

Incessant human population growth is viewed as the leading cause of most of humanity’s scourges, such as poverty, war and starvation.  While the wildlife-conservation movement is valiantly attempting to save the world’s remaining diversity of life, this effort is overwhelmed by the demands of mounting numbers of people.  The obvious solution of birth control and family planning remains largely unknown or ignored — a heritage of our ancient customs and religious beliefs.

Under the onslaught of an ever-increasing human population, it has become clear that humanity and the world’s environments and ecosystems are under serious threat.  In their landmark books, Ehrlich and Ehrlich (1970) and Wilson (1992) demonstrated with overwhelming evidence that reducing the human population, and hence lessening demands on natural ecosystems, is the over-riding factor in the struggle to conserve the natural world.  The current frenzy for exploiting natural resources and the escalating environmental degradation by the world community are in stark contrast to traditional beliefs of Aboriginal Peoples about Mother Earth.  The spiritual inter-relatedness of earth, water, plants, animals and people demanded that great respect be shown to each part of this unity of life.  They appreciated (as few people do today) that their very survival depended on caring for the natural world.

However, in past times and present, when people are in desperate need, they have little choice but to exploit Nature to the fullest of their abilities and technologies.  Witness the rapid extinction of hundreds of species of large animals in North America, Europe, Madagascar, Australia and New Zealand, shortly after early people arrived and populated these land masses.  The American Great Plains region formerly supported a fauna of large animals as rich as that found today in Africa.  In the last 18,000 years, rapid climatic changes, ecosystem dislocations, and particularly over‑hunting by early people, have left a decimated assemblage of large animals.  Over 73% of large mammals and large birds in North America were wiped out (Martin and Klein 1984) before the arrival of Europeans, and the assault process has continued ever since — witness the almost-complete elimination of the Tall-grass Prairie Community, which formerly stretched from Manitoba to Texas.

Overpopulation and Conservation

Dedicated wildlife conservationists valiantly try to manage ecosystems and wildlife populations by conducting research projects, establishing large natural preserves, signing cooperative agreements with landowners, maintaining genetically diverse captive-breeding programs, developing education programs, and many other activities.  But increasingly, all these positive efforts are being overwhelmed by the demands of an ever-growing human population.  As a biologist and educator, I find it disheartening how infrequently the critical topic of birth control and family planning are stressed in society.  We feel justified and safe in discussing human overpopulation and the resulting habitat loss and environmental degradation, but fear to tread further to the logical conclusion.  True, family planning is a taboo subject fraught with public-relations risks, and it may challenge dearly held concepts about individual rights and family, however, it is ultimately the most important message our leaders and educational institutions can champion in saving the Earth’s ecosystems, their treasury of wondrous life forms, and for our very survival.

Perceiving the Problem

It is a daunting task to be heard and understood by people who do not wish to be confronted with lifestyle restrictions, or with depressing facts about human poverty and the demise of wildlife and the environment.  Pre-election platforms of political leaders often include promises to eliminate or alleviate the serious problem of child poverty and related tragedies of society.  While no one questions the desperate need to find solutions, debate, funding and programs all focus on treating symptoms and seldom on the over-riding cause of the dilemma — lack of family planning.

As long ago as 1798, a young British clegyman and economist Thomas Robert Malthus pointed out, in his “Essay on the Principle of Population,” that in favorable times food production increases in an arithmetic progression (2,3,4,5) while the human population (like all life forms) increases geometrically (2,4,8,16).  Unfortunately, this compounding of humanity means that the population will always outstrip food supply and social services, leaving an ever-increasing segment of people without adequate resources on which to survive or to lead a decent quality of life.

Unknown to most people, species are tuned by natural processes, over immense periods of time, for parents to produce (on average) only a sufficient number of surviving offspring to replace themselves — meaning two.  Ancestral females of our species evolved the ability to have over a dozen children in their short lives — a necessity under high levels of mortality.  Around 20,000 years ago, there was an estimated world population of three million people, which likely had a negligible effect on their surroundings.  To ensure tribal survival and integrity, customs and spiritual beliefs of our ancestors became ingrained with the concepts of large families and dominion over all other life.

The Population Explosion

The discovery of agriculture around 9,000 years ago changed everything, generating a giant leap in human birth rate and survival.  Starvation lessened as an ever-looming factor in limiting population numbers, as it had likely operated effectively over several million years of human evolution.  During the period of the Egyptian Pharaohs, the world’s population passed 100 million, 250 million at the time of Christ, 500 million by 1650, and 1 billion by 1850 (Ehrlich and Ehrlich 1970).  With improving technology for food production and distribution, medical care, and social programs, numbers climbed to 2.5 billion in 1950 and 6 billion in 1999.  Over 78 million people are currently added each year, and the population-doubling time continues to drop dramatically.  I find it appalling that the human race has more than tripled (2 to 6.7 billion) in just my life time, and may quadruple before the end of my life.  Obviously this rate of growth cannot continue indefinitely without severe repercussions, which are becoming more evident everyday (e.g., acidification and pollution of the oceans, global warming).

By the year 2050 (within our children’s lifetime), it is anticipated that the burgeoning human population will level off between 11 and 15 billion, driving over 25% of the Earth’s remaining wildlife into extinction (Wilson 1992).  The World Wildlife Fund believes one-third of all plant and animal species could be gone within 20 years.  We are now losing wildlife at the rate of 75-100 species per day (Wilson 1992), squandering through ignorance and greed a 3.6-billion-year heritage of life on the planet.  All these unique life forms are our kin; all of us traceable back over 3.6 billion years of evolutionary history to a common ancestral stock.

Humans now consume almost half the entire world’s photosynthetic capacity (Girardet 1999).  In terms of biomass, there is an estimated 250 million tonnes of humanity and over one-half billion tonnes of our livestock (Cincotta and Engelman 2000).  There are simply not enough room and resources for all us and wildlife to survive.  We surpassed a sustainable level, in balance with Nature, many centuries ago.  A recent study of global human numbers revealed that the existing population is already three times the planet’s carrying capacity to provide a reasonable lifestyle (Pimental 1994).

The Human Tragedy

Countless millions of children and adults die of starvation and neglect each year, and over half the world’s population is seriously malnourished and drinks contaminated water, in spite of massive humanitarian efforts by generous countries and charitable agencies.  Some organizations (including certain religious and political groups) and leaders continue to encourage large families, in an outdated effort to increase membership, and maintain institutional power and influence; but at what cost?  Few people appear to realize that all this human suffering, loss of wildlife, and environmental damage are needless, preventable through education and the practise of family planning in which couples produce no more than two children.  Ancient customs and religious beliefs die hard.

As we begin to fathom the molecular basis of life and to search remote solar systems throughout the infinity of space, we still cannot escape our animal instincts and ancient codes.  “Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.”

These profound words from Genesis were written during a time when large families and mastery of local natural resources were absolutely essential to the survival of family and tribe.  Instincts and customs of procreation and exploitation of Nature, which served our ancestors so well for several million years, are now tearing apart the very fabric of our world.

To maintain the present course is madness and irresponsible.  Nature’s ecosystems and environments progressively curb plague species like ours through drastically increased rates of mortality — escalating famine, terrible wars over contested lands and beliefs, clashes over disappearing resources, devastating outbreaks of old and new diseases, massive loss of life from each major natural event of weather and earth movement, debilitating stress, and poisoning from thousands of  toxic and waste products (all negative-feedback loops in the jargon of biologists).

A Matter of Education

When will parents, educators, politicians, and clergy gain the knowledge, courage and dedication to speak out and support family planning?  When will leaders and the public recognize that overpopulation is the root of so many community problems, and stifles our most-earnest efforts to solve them.  When will women be granted their right to the reproductive control of their bodies and lives?  While the birth rate in Canada and a few other developed countries has finally dropped below two young per couple, there are still many parents exceeding this critical limit, and often without the resources to care for them.  Even if parents can afford to raise many children, each individual in a first-world country consumes and pollutes over 18 times that of a poor person in an under-developed country, thereby compounding the negative effects of overpopulation, and postponing the obvious solution.

As Malthus pointed out so long ago in harsh economic terms, ‘the surplus’ is destined for a life of poverty and misery.  Society’s caring social programs, technology, and natural resources can never keep pace with the incessant demands arising from exponential human-population growth.  The survival of life-support systems and wildlife, our civilization, and social justice depend ultimately on an ethic of family planning, communicated through the teaching of life skills at home, school and church, and supported by governments, concerned groups, industry and the media.  With a right to reproduction must come knowledge and responsibility.

Conserving Biodiversity

Wildlife species cannot be “saved” in the long term by protecting them solely in a cocoon of captivity in zoos or small reserves.  Without the existence of sustainable wild populations — free-ranging, interacting with their environment, and evolving — each species will end up hopelessly inbred, a mere genetic shell of its ancestral stock, and eventually doomed to extinction.  Humans and all other species were created within magnificently complex ecosystems, and without these nurturing wombs they will surely pass away before their time.  Maintaining natural ecosystems is absolutely dependant on a massive reduction in the current human population, which cannot occur without family planning, which in turn relies on a strong educational message backed by resources.

What Can We Do?

We may stagger under a feeling of hopelessness as we become conscious to what is happening to our only home — the Earth — and to the terrible plight of so many people and wildlife.  One often hears the question; “What can I do to help?”  Many of us respond by attempting to live in moderation, purchasing wisely, donating to worthy causes, recycling materials, and by supporting conservation legislation.  While these actions are positive steps, by far our most-significant individual contribution is to have two or fewer children.  In the long term, this is the only factor that really counts.

References:

  • Cincotta, Richard P, and Robert Engelman. 2000. Nature’s Place; human population and the future of biological diversity.  Population Action International, Washington DC. 80 pp.
  • Ehrlich, Paul R., and Anne H. 1970.  Population, resources, environment — issues in human ecology.  383 pp. W.H. Freeman and Company.
  • Girardet, Herbert, 1999. Workshop: Greening urban society. World Conservation 1:10.
  • Martin, Paul S., and Richard G. Klein, editors. 1984. Quaternary extinctions — a prehistoric revolution. University of Arizona Press.
  • Pimentel, David. 1994.  Quoted in; Mobilizing to combat global warming, by D. Hayes, 2000. World Watch, March/April 2000.
  • Wilson, Edward O. 1992. The diversity of life. W.W. Norton and Company, New York. 424 pp.
 

Exotic Animals in Manitoba May 19, 2009

Filed under: Biodiversity,Eco-Dates — Scott Gray @ 4:47 am
Tags: ,

By Dr. Robert E. Wrigley, Curator, Assiniboine Park Zoo, Winnipeg

Exotic animals are species inhabiting Manitoba that arrived through the activities of humans, although the line blurs in cases where humans have altered the landscape to the degree that has permitted the apparently recent entry and establishment of dispersing non-native wildlife (e.g., white-tailed deer) following the advent of agriculture. With the great natural dispersal abilities and adaptiveness of small life forms, countless organisms have invaded the province since the historical period, from viruses like West Nile to injurious insects such as the elm bark beetle, which carries the virulent fungus causing dutch elm disease.

Exotics have also been used widely for agricultural purposes such as all crops, and pollinators (e.g., the alfalfa-pollinating leafcutter bee, Megachile rotundata), in pest control (ladybird beetles to devour aphids), and to attack invasive exotic plants (flea beetles to eat leafy spurge and purple loosestrife). And of course, livestock species (horses, cattle, pigs, goats, sheep, llamas, alpacas, chickens, turkeys, etc) are all exotics, often displacing native wildlife over immense regions. These domestic animals also broadcast weed seeds in their droppings and carry their share of non-native diseases, which all-too-often are transmitted to native wildlife (e.g., anthrax and bovine tuberculosis). The threat of reverse infection, such a tuberculosis-infected elk infecting cattle raised in the same area has devastating consequences for both wild populations and the ranching industry, leading to calls for the culling and even eradication of the wild animals, even in conservation areas like Riding Mountain National Park.

No one has any idea how many non-native species of invertebrates (lower animals without a backbone) have been accidentally introduced and become part of the local fauna of Manitoba, but they no doubt number in the thousands. For example, the introduced pharaoh ant (Monomorium pharaonis) lives only inside heated buildings, thereby avoiding the cold of winter. Earthworms (There are no native species), slugs, and other invertebrates are particularly common in disturbed areas (e.g., city yards). The cabbage white butterfly (Pieris rapae) was accidently introduced from Europe to Quebec about 1860, and has become the most-common butterfly in Manitoba, found in gardens, crops, and forest clearings as far north as Churchill.
There are 12 exotic species of fish in Manitoba, introduced purposefully for sport fishing, or accidentally – common carp, goldfish, rainbow smelt, cutthroat trout, rainbow trout, Koakanee salmon, brown trout, splake (Lake X Brook trout hybrid), tiger trout (Brook X Brown trout hybrid), white bass, smallmouth nass, and largemouth bass. Quite likely others will be added to this list in the future through accidents, illegal release, or connecting of drainage systems (i.e., the Missouri system into the Red River in North Dakota).

Over 100 species of birds have been released into North America, but fortunately most of these failed to become established. A few, like the cattle egret from Africa and Eurasia, has spread throughout the New World on its own (with cattle ranching supporting the birds once here), and occurs sparingly in Manitoba during the summer. Others were released by conservation departments and game associations for hunting opportunities, such as grey partridge, ring-necked pheasant and wild turkey – the latter two usually requiring supplemental food to survive a number of Manitoba winters. The release of the house sparrow, starling, and rock dove (pigeon) in the United States in the late 1800s has caused unimaginable damage to ecosystems throughout North America. These birds devour huge amounts of natural and human foods, confiscate nesting sites formerly utilized by native species, and foul food supplies and human structures with their droppings.

Among the mammals, the house mouse and Norway (brown) rat are the supreme invaders, having colonized the entire world (except Antarctica) wherever humans have travelled. These two pests spread out in summer throughout Manitoba into natural habitats, agricultural fields, and in urban alleys, but must retreat to human shelter for the winter period. Both these Old World residents invaded Manitoba first at Churchill via ships of the early explorers, whalers and traders, and their descendants still survive there in buildings and on upper beaches in summer to this day — well over three centuries later (forts were established by 1670).
Prehistoric humans first arrived into southwestern Manitoba about 8,000 years ago, soon after dry land was exposed from the melting Laurentide Glacier and floodwaters of Glacial Lake Agassiz. Immigrating about 15,000 years ago from eastern Asia, these hunter-gatherers (with ever-advancing cultures and technologies) may also be viewed as a foreign element, in that they invaded an unoccupied continent. However, our species arrived here through natural dispersal (as did thousands of other wildlife species) over a temporary land bridge (Beringia), and hence this case does not fit the definition of exotic. The appearance of humans had major repercussions in many North American ecosystems, mainly through hunting activities (with weapons and use of fire). Humans contributed to the sudden extinction (from 12,000-8,000 years) of over one-half the continent’s large species of mammals and birds.

Releasing any foreign species of plant, animal, or other biota into the wild is biologically indefensible and generally results in unforeseen negative consequences. While some introduced species have failed to become established, the successful invaders invariably out-compete similar native species, outright devour them, or introduce foreign-disease organisms. At the very least, they occupy habitat of native species, seldom providing significant food, cover, or other resources for native wildlife. It is naive and uniformed, whether instigated by a conservation department or a private person releasing an unwanted pet, to think that such a release will be a positive step for the organism, the species, or the biotic community, and yet the practice continues. The problem may sometimes be compounded by introducing an exotic natural predator of an exotic pest, as is the current practice in biological control. While occasionally this proves helpful in reducing (not eliminating) the primary pest, the fact remains that an additional exotic has been introduced, often without full knowledge of long-term effects on the ecosystem.

The release or escape of genetically modified varieties of crops and other organisms are exotics of major concern, since the results frequently have far-reaching effects, including the real possibility of altering the genetics, ecology, or even the survival of wild species. While no doubt a boon to food production and company profitability, transgenic (recombinant-DNA) technology carries inherent risks for species, ecosystems and human health. This is a contoversial issue, with many known and unknown factors to consider. Most countries, including Canada, have embraced this technology (or will in time), since economics and food production are always viewed a higher priority than ecosystem health and wildlife conservation. With increasing and rapid international shipping of goods and travel of people, thousands of additional exotics (from viruses and bacteria to vertebrates) will be introduced to North America and Manitoba in the future. One can only guess what the impacts of all these changes will be on our native biotic communities and on human health.